[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [JDEV] date, encoding

To: jdev@jabber.org
Subject: Re: [JDEV] date, encoding
From: Lindsay.Marshall@newcastle.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:44:06 +0100 (GMT)
cc: belg4mit@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <199907300137.VAA02137@calloway.mit.edu>
Reply-To: jdev@jabber.org
Sender: owner-jdev@jabber.org


> Dave beat me to the punch on the encoding. pass encoding (I still think it'd
> work better as a tag rather than an attribute?). And then leave it up to the
> client as to whether or not it cares about/can handle it. As long it gets
> passed along in an 8-bit format, right?

No, no, no, it is an attribute *not* a tag! You can have an encpoding
attribute on any tag that has CDATA. Other wise you then having to
allow embedding of the <encoding> tag inside anythign with CDATA. An
attribute is much simpler.

L.
-- 
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Lindsay

References:
- [JDEV] date, encoding
  - From: Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: [JDEV] Character Encodings and Languages thread
Next by Date: Re: [JDEV] Further encoding thoughts
Prev by thread: [JDEV] date, encoding
Next by thread: Re: [JDEV] date, encoding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread