RE: [JDEV] Re: Jabber registry

["Thomas D. Charron" <tcharron@my-deja.com>]

  The wonder of jabber is, it doesn't matter what anyone thinks..  It can quite literally support anything anyone wants..

  One LDAP idea I was thinking of that would be VERY nice would be distributed servers.  You could very easily be part of jabber.org, but have nh.us.jabber.org and wa.us.jabber.org be connecting to the same LDAP user data..

---
Thomas Charron

On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:57:37   Patrick McCuller wrote:
>
>	The proposal is fine as it is, but this is exactly what LDAP is *for*.  You
>don't need to invent or write anything, including a data store, LDAP
>interfaces are well known, documented, and stable, and existing LDAP servers
>could be tapped for user profile information. LDAP servers can be backed up,
>replicated, and so on, all independantly of jabber. Additionally, LDAP
>authentication will be integrated into Jabber servers (a mod_ldap,
>undoubtably) eventually, probably sooner rather than later.
>
>	With LDAP as the registry, users could search or update the registry using
>standard tools, or a web interface. LDAP client libraries are relatively
>easy to integrate with both clients and servers.
>
>	There is also a good free LDAP server at http://www.openldap.org/ which I
>can vouch for. The web hosting company I work for uses it exclusively, and I
>do all of their LDAP-related development.
>
>	Not to try to convince you or anything.  :)
>
>
>Patrick
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-jdev@jabber.org [mailto:owner-jdev@jabber.org]On Behalf Of
>> Jeremie
>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 6:26 PM
>> To: jdev@jabber.org
>> Subject: [JDEV] Re: Jabber registry
>>
>>
>> > Sure thing. I don't care how it is stored, so long as the information
>> > is easily available to jabber clients so they can look it up when
>> > sending messages. I saw the roster as being the single store for all
>> > relevant info on users. Being a newvomer I may have overlooked this
>> > part. Are there any docs on a profile store/registry? Any substantial
>> > thoughts in the matter?
>>
>> Yes, I wrote up a quick proposal some time ago at:
>> http://www.jabber.org/developers/archive/9904/msg00022.html
>>
>> It's partially implemented already, and I plan on having it ready to test
>> by 0.7.  There have been a few changes/updates and there needs to be a
>> good deal more documenting/explaining on it, which is all on it's way
>> after I get caught up on other things.
>>
>> Jer
>>
>>
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.