Re: [JDEV] Character Encodings and Languages thread

["Thomas D. Charron" <tcharron@my-deja.com>]

  DARNED good question about AIM..  Does TOC support multiple charset's?

  As for your idea on each tag being a seperate document, it's an idea worth considering, but IMHO not very nice..  Perhaps a better idea would be to modify expat to look for the encoding attributes and modify it's behavior accordingly..
---
Thomas Charron

On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:06:05   Dave Smith wrote:
>Jer, you noted that it's not possible to change encodings on the fly. :) I
>would like to respectfully point out that it would be perfectly possible
>(and could even simplify the Jabber parse routines) if we modified the
>Jabber protocol to be one-document-to-one-packet instead of using a
>one-document-to-many-packets approach. This way, expat switches between
>encodings on the fly.
>
>Just an idea... :)
>
>Even if we do this, implementing the client is gonna be tricky since it's
>going to have to be able to parse a funkily (is that a word?!) encoded
>document....
>
>Just out of curiosity, how does AIM handle this? Or ICQ for that matter?
>
>D.
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.